2011 HGS Applied Geosciences Mudstone ConferencePost Conference Survey questionsConference Framework1. Were the themes and topics covered what you expected, i.e., as advertised?2. Do you like the four component nature of the conference of Geology, Geochemisty, Geophysics and Completions?3. How would you rate the overall quality of the technical material presented during the presentations as compared to what is typically presented at industry conferences?4. How would you rate the overall applicability of the talks to your day to day work ?5. Rate the amount of time devoted to each presentation. Was there too much/too little time for each topic/ questions? 6. Are the summaries at the end of the day valuable?7. Was the new Monday evening panel dinner of interest and value? How can it be improved?8. Are there additional topics you would like to see covered or specific speakers you would like to hear in 2012?9. Do you have any suggestions for topics that have been sufficiently covered in the literature and at conferences and should be deleted in favor of other topics?10. Does holding this conference over two full days provide sufficient time to address the topics that were covered?11. Would you like the opportunity to for a lab tour/field trip?12. Would you like to be appointed to a position of responsibility in the next 2012 conference or provide a talk?13. In the interest of continued improvement, what is your number one suggestion to improve the conference in 2012?Conference Venue1. What were the positives and negatives associated with the facilities/ food/ services?2. Would you recommend using the same conference facility again?